I have always been fascinated by
Anne Bradstreet, particularly by the fact that she was America’s first
published poet. In class, we have briefly
discussed how women’s writing was often times in the past suppressed and not
seen as true art. I find it ironic that
such writing was diminished when in fact it was a woman who initially started what we now know as American
literature. Was the attention span of
prior generations so small that they clearly forgot this fact for hundreds of
years?
What I find most intriguing about
Bradstreet’s poetry is the genuine honesty and emotion that is present
throughout her writing. In “The Author
to Her Book”, Bradstreet laments the fact that some of her work was published
without her permission. If one did not
know the true circumstances, it would be quite easy to mistake the topic for that
of a child rather than writing, which shows the reader how much she truly cared
about her work. The love that Bradstreet
had for her poetry, as well as her protective nature of it, is both interesting
and, as time would inevitably prove, warranted.
Due to the scrutiny that society would have regarding women’s writing,
Bradstreet was right in regretting the publication of her work for all eyes to
see and judge. Thankfully, though,
society has progressed, and we can now see Bradstreet’s poetry for what it is:
timeless.
"Author to her Book" is my favorite Bradstreet poem, and I think it's brilliant that it can be read different ways. It interests me to think if her poetry would have been published at all if it had been voluntary instead of submitted without her permission.
ReplyDelete